Greenfield Vs Brownfield Approach

Greenfield Approach: A Clean Slate for SAP S/4HANA Transformation

Brownfield Approach to SAP S/4HANA: Building Upon the Foundation

Choosing the Right Path: Greenfield vs. Brownfield Considerations for Businesses


Greenfield vs. Brownfield Approach: What’s the Right Strategy for  SAP S/4HANA Migration? 

When it comes to enterprise resource planning (ERP), transitioning to SAP S/4HANA isa massive leap forward for modern enterprises seeking to modernize their systems and processes. This migration journey involves important decisions, not the least of which is the choice between taking a greenfield approach or a brownfield one. Greenfield vs. brownfield is a long-debated business philosophy, and it’s critical for businesses to weigh both approaches as they begin SAP S/4HANA migration.

Read on to learn the relevance of greenfield vs. brownfield and explore the pros and cons of both approaches. We’ll also give you some tips to help you figure out which data migration approach is the best fit for your business.


Greenfield Approach: A Clean Slate for SAP S/4HANA Transformation

The greenfield strategy in SAP S/4HANA migration basically means you’re starting from scratch.  This approach means you will build a completely new system instance independent of the existing ERP landscape. The greenfield approach is an excellent opportunity for enterprises to reevaluate every step of their processes, eliminate legacy complexities and adopt end-to-end best practices.


  • Advantages of the greenfield approach:
    • Process Optimization: With a fresh start, businesses can optimize processes according to industry standards, taking advantage of SAP S/4HANA’s streamlined functionalities.
    • Minimal Legacy Burden: The absence of legacy data and customizations reduces the risk of carrying forward outdated or unnecessary elements.
    • Innovation Acceleration: The greenfield approach encourages the integration of innovative technologies, such as artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things (IoT), into the new ERP ecosystem.
    • Flexibility and Control: The freedom to design and customize the project as the organization sees fit without having to consider existing structures or constraints.
  • Challenges of the Greenfield Approach:
    • Data Migration: Transferring historical data from the old system to the new instance requires careful planning and execution to ensure accuracy and completeness.
    • Change Management: Implementing a new system entails change across the organization, necessitating change management strategies to ease employee adaptation.
    • Higher Costs and Longer Implementation: The greenfield approach requires a complete redevelopment, which can lead to higher costs and longer implementation times.
    • Higher risk: Since no existing infrastructure or experience is leveraged, there is some risk in getting new processes up and running and integrating them.


Brownfield Approach to SAP S/4HANA: Building Upon the Foundation

In contrast, the brownfield approach builds the SAP S/4HANA instance on top of the existing ERP system, leveraging the existing data, customizations and configurations. In a nutshell, the brownfield approach represents a smoother transition path by preserving familiar elements while benefiting from the innovations of SAP S/4HANA.


  • Advantages of the Brownfield Approach:
    • Cost Efficiency: Organizations can safeguard the investments made in their existing ERP systems by reusing configurations and customizations, as no complete new development is required.
    • Reduced Disruption: The brownfield approach minimizes disruption to daily operations by maintaining familiar processes and interfaces.
    • Faster Implementation: Leveraging existing data and settings accelerates the migration process, potentially reducing downtime and minimizing the learning curve.
    • Lower Risk: The existing infrastructure and experience from previous projects reduce the risk of errors or unforeseen problem
  • Challenges of the Brownfield Approach:
    • Legacy Complexity: The inclusion of legacy customizations might lead to complexities in the new system, potentially hindering the adoption of SAP S/4HANA’s modern capabilities.
    • Data Cleansing: Over time, data quality issues might accumulate in the existing system, which could be carried over to the new SAP S/4HANA instance without proper cleansing.
    • Design Constraints: Because of the pre-existing structure, there may be constraints on customizing or redesigning the project.
    • Technological Limitations: Leveraging existing infrastructure means that older technologies or solutions may need to be used, which can lead to limitations in technological innovation.


Choosing the Right Path: Greenfield vs. Brownfield Considerations for Businesses

Selecting between the greenfield vs. brownfield approaches is a strategic decision that depends on an organization’s unique circumstances, goals, and resources.

  • Transformation Goals:
    • Greenfield: Organizations seeking a radical transformation, process optimization, and the incorporation of cutting-edge technologies should consider the greenfield approach.
    • Brownfield: Businesses aiming for a smoother transition and wanting to preserve existing investments and familiarity might find the brownfield approach more suitable.
  • Risk Tolerance:
    • Greenfield: While offering greater innovation potential, the greenfield approach involves higher implementation risk due to the need to build everything from scratch.
    • Brownfield: The brownfield approach carries lower risks as it builds upon the existing foundation, but it might limit the extent of transformation.
  • Resource Availability:
    • Greenfield: Organizations with the resources to commit to a comprehensive redesign and data migration process can fully capitalize on the greenfield approach.
    • Brownfield: Companies with limited resources and tight timelines might find the brownfield approach more feasible due to its faster implementation.

The journey to SAP S/4HANA migration is a pivotal moment for organizations, shaping their digital landscape for years to come. The decision between the greenfield and brownfield approaches underscores the importance of aligning the migration strategy with the business’s overall transformation goals, risk tolerance and available resources. Whether embarking on a more radical transformation with a greenfield approach or building upon an existing foundation with the brownfield approach, the SAP S/4HANA migration journey is an opportunity for businesses to embrace innovation, efficiency and competitiveness in today’s dynamic business landscape. It is also possible to take a combination of both approaches, leveraging existing infrastructure while integrating new elements and innovations.

Ultimately, it’s important to make an informed decision that fits your organization’s specific needs and goals. In-depth analysis and consultation with experts can help you choose the right strategic approach and ensure the success of your project.

At gicom, we help enterprises navigate the intricate realm of SAP S/4HANA migration and ERP transformation so that organizations can confidently make informed decisions about adopting the greenfield or brownfield approach. In addition, our innovative solutions are geared to help you increase margin and profitability throughout the lifecycle of your agreements, simplifying agreement management, so you can seamlessly transition to the future of digital enterprise solutions.


Ready to discover more about how gicom can help your company thrive while transitioning to S/4HANA?

Contact our Expert

Jan Pötter Portrait

Jan Pötter, Head of SAP Transformation Management

LinkedIn: Jan Pötter

Get in touch with our SAP Transformation expert Jan Pötter today!